Apr
7
2011
Posted by
editor
Comments

In Case You Missed It… Venezuela’s militia: A Caribbean Tripoli?

Hugo Chávez grooms a militia
The Economist

April 7, 2011

IT IS a long way from Tripoli to Caracas. But although Hugo Chávez, unlike his friend and close ally Muammar Qaddafi, is an elected president, there are some striking similarities between the Libyan and Venezuelan regimes. Mr Chávez’s grassroots “communes” resemble Colonel Qaddafi’s “people’s committees”, for example. And a new decree, published last month, speeds up the creation of a sectarian militia like that which opened fire against unarmed protesters in Libya.

A year ago Mr Chávez assembled more than 30,000 uniformed, gun-toting militiamen and women for a parade in the centre of Caracas. Unsheathing a sword that belonged to Simón Bolívar, Venezuela’s independence hero, he led them in an oath to work tirelessly to “consolidate…the socialist revolution”. Officials claim that the militias total 125,000, and that the goal is to reach 2m. Sceptics put the number trained so far at under 25,000.

Under the new law, the Bolivarian militia will now have its own officers and will be commanded directly by the president. That is something the army previously resisted. But General Carlos Mata Figueroa, the defence minister, insists that the militia is a “complementary”, not parallel, force. According to Carlos Escarrá, a chavista legislator, it is “disingenuous” of opponents to suggest that the militia “will be a sort of praetorian guard for the president”.

Mr Chávez’s own statements suggest otherwise. The president has always said that his leftist “revolution” is “peaceful, but armed”, and that violence would ensue if it were to be thwarted. In December 2012 he faces a presidential election which opinion polls suggest he might lose. But both he and his top general, Henry Rangel Silva, have said that the armed forces would resist the orders of a post-Chávez government. According to General Rangel, the high command is “wedded to the political project” of Mr Chávez.

The officer corps may not be. A recently retired military dissident says only 10% are unconditional chavistas, with 20% constitutionalists and the rest pragmatic. If so, Mr Chávez’s decision to strengthen his paramilitary force may make sense to him. But it bodes ill for peace in Venezuela.

Like Colonel Qaddafi, Mr Chávez also has foreign fighters he may be able to count on in a fix. Venezuela has an unknown number of Cuban military advisers. Some sources say the Cubans give orders and (with Russians) run the intelligence service. But tens of thousands of Cubans, all with military training, have been deployed across the country as medical staff, sports instructors and the like. Many have defected and fled abroad. But some might defend the revolution, guns in hand.

Such a scenario is an explicit part of the government’s planning. Mr Chávez claims, and may even believe, that “the empire” (ie, the United States) is seeking an excuse to topple him by force. Colonel Qaddafi, he declared, “is doing what he has to do, resisting imperialist aggression”. The doctrine of Venezuela’s armed forces now includes a version of what Cuba calls “the war of all the people”. In theory, all Venezuelans must train to resist an occupier.

Many Venezuelans fear that the militia is really aimed at Mr Chávez’s domestic opponents. The president accuses the opposition leadership, almost daily, of being a fifth column for foreign capitalists desperate to grab the country’s oil. From there, it is a short step to imagining the chavista militia, armed with Russian Dragunov sniper-rifles, taking aim at counter-revolutionaries. “It is not possible to stage an unarmed revolution against this bourgeoisie,” Mr Chávez told his militia rally last year. Mere bravado, perhaps, but many Venezuelans fear he may be serious.

 
Mar
25
2011
Posted by
editor
Comments

In Case You Missed It…Articles Roundup Week of 3/25/11

In this week’s roundup…a new round of paranoid and delusional assertions from Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez coincide with proof of his dwindling popularity and a new scandal regarding state-owned PDVSA.

Venezuela’s Chavez Claims US Plans To Thwart His Reelection, The Wall Street Journal

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Sunday that the U.S. and its allies have plans to sabotage his bid for re-election in 2012 as part of an “imperial” doctrine to control the world’s oil supply. “I know of the plans that they have for Venezuela, infiltrate the country, create [unstable] conditions for 2012,” Chavez said. “They should not even think about it!” Speaking during his weekly program, “Hello! President,” Chavez also denounced the “indiscriminate bombing” of the UN-sanctioned military intervention in Libya as motivated by the oil-rich country’s resources.

Poll suggests Venezuelans split between pro- and anti-Chavez camps; one-third undecided, The Canadian Press

A poll suggests Venezuelans with a preference are split between President Hugo Chavez and the opposition, although a sizable one-third are undecided about whom they would vote for if elections were held soon. Leon said the opposition politicians with the most support in the latest poll were Henrique Capriles, governor of Miranda state, 17 percent; former presidential candidate Manuel Rosales, 9 percent; Pablo Perez, governor of Zulia state, 7 percent; and Leopoldo Lopez, a former Caracas District mayor, 7 percent.

Venezuela Opposition Blocked From Discussing PDVSA Pension, The Wall Street Journal

Opposition legislators in Venezuela have been blocked in the national parliament from discussing the apparent use of the state oil company’s pension fund in a Ponzi scheme run by a former financial adviser to Petroleos de Venezuela, or PDVSA. A proposal to bring the matter before the National Assembly was rejected last week by the ruling-party majority.

Chavez enacts decree allowing pro-government militias to receive weapons from military, The Washington Post

New rules authorizing Venezuela’s military to distribute weapons to pro-government militias took effect Tuesday, raising concern among critics who say the armed groups could be used by President Hugo Chavez to cement his hold on power.

Hugo Chavez Decries Capitalism….On Mars, The Wall Street Journal

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who routinely blames Capitalism for many of the world’s troubles, pointed elsewhere in the galaxy for his latest critique, saying Tuesday that the economic system may have destroyed life on Mars. “I have always said, have heard, that it would not be strange that there had been civilization on Mars,” the firebrand socialist said on Venezuela’s state television.

 
Feb
15
2011
Posted by
editor
Comments

Venezuela’s Government Stranglehold

By Francisco Toro of CaracasChronicles

Venezuela’s increasingly restrictive foreign currency exchange control system is becoming a key instrument in the Chávez government’s bid to establish hegemonic control over Venezuelan society. By giving the government a stranglehold over the country’s economic life, currency controls have become a prime mechanism in crafting a new economic elite fully subservient to the governing clique.

Venezuela’s economy is uncommonly vulnerable to interference via currency controls. Of course, threatening long jail terms against those who sell foreign currency at market rates would be a strong tool for authoritarian control in any setting, but nowhere more so than in Venezuela’s “port economy” where most consumption goods are imported and paid for with the proceeds from oil exports.

In a country where, for instance, most staple foods are imported, giving the government the ability to decide who can and who can’t buy foreign currency, when and at what price, gives it unprecedentedly fine-grained control over who grows rich and who goes bust.

The reason is that Venezuela’s official exchange rate is extravagantly overvalued. According to economists the country’s “equilibrium exchange rate” – the rate at which the bolivar would likely settle if it was allowed to float freely against the dollar – is perhaps at twice the level of the official exchange rate.

Another way to say that is that the government deeply subsidizes the purchase of foreign currency, but only to the favored few.

And with the cut-rate dollars that only they can access, the favored few are able to import consumption goods and sell them on at prices that Venezuelan producers could never match. The result is a kind of backwards-dumping dynamic, where government policy systematically favors foreign-made goods over their Venezuelan counterparts.

One consequence of this is deindustrialization: the wholesale hollowing out of Venezuela’s light manufacturing base. Another is that favored importers – which includes the government’s own food distribution network – reap huge windfalls, while those without access to cheap, subsidized dollars languish.

It is lost on no one, of course, that political loyalty is the number one requirement for those obtaining those covetted cut-rate dollars, making the entire system a powerful mechanism to enforce political allegiance to the government on the part of a new class of crony importers.

Those without favored access to dollars – a category that includes all those so much as suspected of political independence – are forced instead into the now illegal “parallel market”: in effect, a black market where traders face lengthy jail sentences and heavy fines for helping others to finance  imports or save in hard currency.

The system criminalizes activities that would be routine throughout the rest of the region. Trying to save in foreign exchange is now a crime, as it is to take your gold jewelry with you on a trip and sell it for convertible currency abroad. Even citing the real (i.e., non-controlled) price of dollars in domestic currency is now a crime punishable with a fine worth up to Bs.55,000 – some $12,790 at the official rate, much less at the “Voldemort” rate. (It is, of course, illegal for me to tell you what the real going rate for dollars is.)

Illegal currency traders are nothing if not resourceful: they have set up and maintain anonymous websites to share reference prices, and communicate actively to keep the market operating.

Secure smartphones – particularly Blackberries – have become the tool of choice in enabling the market to operate. Still, insecurity runs deep: trading in this way is now technically punishable with up to 7 years in prison.

Of course, as with any illegal market, Venezuela’s unregulated currency market seems a magnet for organized crime. A market where contracts are not enforceable through the courts tends to turn into one where contracts are enforced through the barrel of a gun. Already, stories of drug traffickers turning to illegal bolivar trading as part of sophisticated money-laundering operations are widespread. Everyday people and legitimate businesses barred from the regulated currency control system are increasingly drawn into contact with these criminal elements merely to carry out the kinds of necessary trades that would be routine anywhere else in the hemisphere.

And, of course, by criminalizing the kinds of business transactions that legitimate businesses need to carry out routinely to remain in operation, the government could well arm itself for a broad crackdown on the private sector down the road.

With dozens of companies now technically in violation of Currency Control laws, much of Venezuela’s private sector has been forced into a semi-clandestine position, permanently one investigation away from shut-down and the arrest of its top executives.

Charges, if they do come, will be technically “correct” – in the same way the charges against Rosa Parks were technically “CORRECT” under Montgomery, Alabama’s existing ordinances on bus-ridership.

Keynes once famously wrote that “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency.” Surely, no currency is more debauched than that which cannot be legally traded.