Dec
14
2010
Posted by
admin
Comments

Expropriation and Punishment

Workers Face Intimidation and Reprisals in the Wake of Agroisleña Takeover

by Francisco Toro (@CaracasChron)

As soon as he heard that President Chávez had issued an expropriation decree for Agroisleña – a major agricultural extension service firm providing seed, fertilizer and credit to more than thousands of growers – José Rocha knew his life was about to change forever. He couldn’t have guessed, though, was that it would all happen so fast.

“State Police, National Police, Army, National Guard, Bolivarian Militia: they all showed up the next day,” says Rocha, 35, who’d worked at Agroisleña’s tech support help-desk for over 15 years – his entire career. From then on, Rocha would be working under the gaze of heavily armed men.

More disconcerting than the regular police and Armed Forces presence, he says, were these guys wearing green Che Guevara T-shirts with double-barreled shotguns slung across their backs milling ominously around the plant. “I don’t know which group they belonged to – I’m not an expert in these things,” Rocha says, “but they didn’t seem to be part of any organized security force, maybe they had something to do with some private security detail.” One thing is for sure: when people like that overrun the place where you work, you don’t waltz up to them and ask for I.D.

This takeover on October 4th set the stage for a tense few weeks when Agroisleña’s employees would have to get used to working in a heavily ideologized environment or suffer the consequences. According to another company worker who spoke on condition of anonymity, “we couldn’t have any meeting inside the office without at least two or three members of the takeover team coming to listen in.”

For Rocha, the pressure was intense: “imagine having to work with armed people looking over your shoulders at all times,” He says. “They made it clear to us that people who didn’t share the president’s ideology wouldn’t have a future inside of the company,” says Rocha.

It was no bluff.

Within a few weeks, he was fired.

The story of Agroisleña started in 1958 when a Spanish immigrant from the Canary Islands, Enrique Fraga, founded the company. The company grew to be the leader in the agricultural services market in Venezuela and even exported goods to other Latin American countries.  At the time of its expropriation, the company employed 2,500 employees and was said to be responsible for 12,000 more indirect jobs.  Many of the farmers it serves were themselves descendants of Spanish immigrants that still practice agriculture.

Today, two months after the Agroisleña takeover, some 100 former employees have been fired, with another 15 or so choosing to quit rather than endure the heavy intimidation. At the same time, over 300 company salesmen – who work largely on commission – haven’t received their sales bonuses since the takeover. And, by all accounts, morale among those left behind is low and deteriorating.

Of particular concern is that none of those who have lost their jobs have received their statutory severance pay; the cornerstone of Venezuela’s social safety net. Weeks of protests outside Agroisleña’s head office in Aragua State have ensued.

Technically, Venezuelan workers have an absolute legal right to severance pay. A form of “deferred compensation”, severance pay in Venezuela is actually a portion of employees’ salaries that employers are legally obliged to set aside each month and deposit in a ringfenced, interest-bearing bank account, to be paid as a lump-sum when an employee leaves the company.

There are virtually no circumstances under Venezuelan labor law where an employer is allowed to withhold severance pay; doing so is tantamount to picking the fired workers’ pocket. These days, though, Venezuelan labor law seems to apply to private sector employers only. The takeover board isn’t just refusing to handover employees’ deferred compensation, it’s refusing to even schedule a meeting with the fired workers to talk about the issue.

For José Rocha, there could hardly have been a worse time to lose the only job he’s ever had. His first-born son is just six months old now, leaving his wife to support the family on her salary alone. “I spend most of my time at home now,” he says, “taking care of the baby.”

Venezuelan labor law, as amended under the Chávez regime, bans firing parents of children under one year old. That, needless to say, made no difference either.

Still, what rankles Rocha the most is the petty humiliations he was subjected to.

“They didn’t really bother to tell me what was going on,” he says, “one day I came into the office and found another person sitting at my desk. Simple as that.”

After milling around the office for some time, unsure what to do, he was approached by one of the new security personnel who told him he could no longer be in the building and escorted him to the front desk. Only after pleading with the guard to explain what was going on did the new Human Resources team get around to informing him he’d been fired.

“Imagine you’ve been working for a company for 15 years and when they go to fire you they send a guy with a gun to physically throw you out!” he says, bitterly.

For Rocha and his former co-workers, the future is full of uncertainty. “They say the company was exploiting us, but the truth is that I’d made plans for my future that went hand-in-hand with the company’s future,” he says. All of that is now shattered.

When Venezuelan firms get nationalized, the government usually portrays the move as a way to defend the workers from the predations of their capitalist paymasters. Agroisleña was no exception. It’s just that the workers so bravely defended by such measures are, more often than not, oddly abstract: the actual, flesh-and-bone people who work in expropriated companies, in contrast, get screwed.

 
Dec
10
2010
Posted by
admin
Comments

In Case You Missed It…Articles Roundup Week of 12/6/10

WikiLeaks continues to expose President Chávez’ antics, publishing details of his ties to Russia and involvement in funding election fraud efforts in Nicaragua. The leaked cables also disclose that the state-owned oil company PDVSA, perceived as the saving grace of the shrinking Venezuelan economy, has been scrambling to attract foreign partners. The Venezuelan financial crunch appears to more serious than analysts expected or previously predicted.

In addition to news of international corruption and economic crisis, Globovisión pushed back on President Chávez’s takeover of a fifth of its shares. The government’s open war against private property continued this week. Taking advantage of the needs of flood victims, President Chávez ordered the seizure of nearly 36 hectares of privately owned land. In Venezuela, no crisis goes un-politicized!

In case you missed it, here is the news out of Caracas:

WikiLeaks: Russia sold Chávez over 100 anti-aircraft missiles, El Universal
Russian officials told United States officials in 2009 that they had “sold Venezuela, up to that moment, 100 man-portable anti-aircraft missiles, one of the weapons that Washington considers most destabilizing in the region,” according to diplomatic cables leaked by WikiLeaks and published by the Spanish newspaper El País.

Ortega has received ‘suitcases full of cash’ from Venezuela, leaked cables say, Los Angeles Times

The Nicaraguan president also is believed to have used money from drug traffickers to finance electoral fraud, according to diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks. President Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua has received “suitcases full of cash” from Venezuela and is believed to have used money from drug traffickers to finance electoral fraud, according to secret U.S. diplomatic cables disclosed this week.

 

WikiLeaks Cables: Oil Giants Squeeze Chávez as Venezuela Struggles, The Guardian

Venezuela’s tottering economy is forcing Hugo Chávez to make deals with foreign corporations to save his socialist revolution from going broke. The Venezuelan president has courted European, American and Asian companies in behind-the-scenes negotiations that highlight a severe financial crunch in his government.

 

US cable: Cuba to be insolvent within 2-3 years, AP

A newly released confidential U.S. diplomatic cable predicted Cuba’s economic situation could become “fatal” within two to three years, and detailed concerns from other countries’ diplomats — including China — that the communist-run country has been slow to adopt reforms.

 

Venezuela’s Chávez Threatens To Take Over BBVA Unit, Other Banks, Fox Business

Amid a housing shortage in Venezuela, President Hugo Chávez threatened to expropriate the local unit of Spanish bank Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (BBVA, BBVA.MC) and other banks if they don’t ensure that homes and apartments they finance get lived in immediately.

 

Nelson Mezerhane: “Government tries to silence Globovisión”, El Universal

The businessman, who is residing in the United States, warned: “Sindicato Ávila is not part of the group of companies owned by Banco Federal, which you (President Hugo Chávez) arbitrarily seized for the sole benefit of your government.”

Chávez puts pressure on news network, Business Report
Venezuela’s government on Monday took control of a fifth of shares in Globovisión, an opposition television network opposed to President Hugo Chávez, the state news agency said.

Datanálisis: Más del 70% de la población continúa rechazando las expropiaciones, Noticias 24

El presidente de Datanálisis, Luis Vicente León, explicó que más de 70% de la población continúa rechazando las expropiaciones. Un 63% de la población piensa que con la expropiación de Agroisleña se hará más crítico el abastecimiento de alimentos.

Chávez Eyes Private Land to Help Flood Victims, VOA News

Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez says the government will seize private land and tourist resorts to house the thousands of people made homeless by the worst flooding in 40 years. Mr. Chávez ordered the government to seize nearly 36 hectares of privately owned land near the national airport and authorized the building of thousands of housing units.

Group: Near 14,000 murders in Venezuela last year, The Washington Post
Close to 14,000 people were murdered in Venezuela last year and the figure could be significantly higher, a prominent human rights group said Thursday, alluding to the rampant crime that has become a central concern of Venezuelans.

 
Dec
9
2010
Posted by
admin
Comments

WikiLeaks Cables: Oil Giants Squeeze Chávez as Venezuela Struggles

The Guardian

December 9, 2010

WikiLeaks cables reveal that all is not well at Venezuela’s state-owned oil company PDVSA. Venezuela’s tottering economy is forcing Hugo Chávez to make deals with foreign corporations to save his socialist revolution from going broke.

The Venezuelan president has courted European, American and Asian companies in behind-the-scenes negotiations that highlight a severe financial crunch in his government.

Venezuela’s state-owned oil company, PDVSA, is the engine of the economy but buckled when given an ultimatum by its Italian counterpart and has scrambled to attract foreign partners, according to confidential US embassy cables released by WikiLeaks.

The memos depict an unfolding economic fiasco and suggest some of Chávez’s key allies – Argentina, Brazil and Cuba – are gravely concerned at Venezuela’s direction. “President Chávez, for his part, is acutely aware of the impact the country’s general economic trajectory has had on his popularity,” says one cable.

With a recession, underfunded infrastructure and 30% inflation, Venezuela’s economic woes are no secret. But the government has insisted PDVSA, the country’s golden goose, is thriving and capable of funding Chávez’s vision of “21st century socialism”.

Chávez took over the company and declared it a revolutionary instrument after defeating a management-led strike in 2003. He nationalised and expropriated swaths of the oil industry and said PDVSA would fill the slack left by departing foreign companies, declaring a triumph for sovereignty and socialism.

Analysts have suspected all is not well, citing corruption, broken rigs and unpaid suppliers, but the foreign oil companies still in Venezuela stay largely silent lest they anger the government and find themselves locked out of the western hemisphere’s biggest energy reserves.

However, in separate private conversations with the ambassador, Patrick Duddy, industry figures detailed the parlous state of the industry. A senior manager from Chevron estimated the state oil company’s output at 2.1m to 2.3m barrels per day, well below official declarations of 3.3m.

Chevron was funnelling profits to the US and no longer investing in Venezuela, the manager said. An executive at oil exploration company Baker Hughes Inc said the firm had a similar strategy and “received a congratulatory message from BHI corporate headquarters for not growing the business (and increasing its risk exposure)”.

A director of Mitsubishi in Venezuela was quoted as saying Chávez’s executives were struggling to attract investment. “[The businessman] stated that privately, senior PDVSA leadership is extremely upset with the failure of international companies to register bids. He added that Mitsubishi sent a letter to PDVSA explaining why the conditions offered by Venezuela were insufficient and what would need to be changed to make a bid commercially viable.”

Italy’s ambassador to Caracas, Luigi Maccotta, told his US counterpart that Italian oil company ENI squeezed PDVSA over an Orinoco belt deal in January this year knowing it had no one else to turn to.

The Italians delayed the signing by two days to reinforce the Venezuelan government’s “need for ENI”. Paolo Scaroni, the company’s CEO, then faced down Venezuela’s oil minister, Rafael Ramirez, over changes to terms and conditions.

“Thirty minutes before the ceremony was supposed to begin Scaroni told Ramirez: ‘Take it or leave it, I can get on my plane and move on.’ Ramirez apparently used that half an hour to convince President Chávez to accept all of ENI’s proposed changes or risk losing the deal,” according to the US cable. The Italians said they would not pay PDVSA a standard signing bonus because the company already owed them $1bn.

Venezuela’s oil minister, who is the head of PDVSA, travelled to Moscow and Beijing hoping for solidarity deals with allies, only to find the Russians and Chinese as profit-minded as western companies.

Venezuela’s oil travails, combined with rolling power blackouts, decaying infrastructure and expropriations, have worried its other friends. Jorge Taiana, Argentina’s foreign minister, told a US envoy that Cristina Kirchner’s government did not agree with Chávez’s assault on the private sector. “Taiana said [former president] Péron had already gone through a nationalisation phase in the 1940s and the country had learned its lesson.”

In a separate cable Marco Aurélio Garcia, a foreign policy adviser to the Brazilian president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, was quoted telling the US ambassador that Venezuela had “deep domestic economic problems, particularly with regard to energy supply”.

The US ambassador to Havana reported that the Castro government, which depends heavily on Venezuelan financial support, was fretting about its benefactor’s economic health. “The view from the French is that Venezuela ‘es en flames’ and a source of serious concern for Cuba.”

Chávez has brushed off claims of meltdown as capitalist propaganda, saying Venezuela’s economy will emerge stronger than ever from current difficulties. The government is studying a draft law to facilitate further oil industry nationalisations to deepen the revolution.