Sep
20
2012
Posted by
admin
Comments

Can PDVSA Survive Chávez?

jose r cardenas Can PDVSA Survive Chávez?

José R. Cárdenas

José R. Cárdenas served in several foreign policy positions during the George W. Bush administration (2004-2009), including on the National Security Council staff. He is a consultant with Vision Americas in Washington, DC.

The recent explosions at the Amuay oil refinery in Punto Fijo that killed some 41 people could not have come at a worse time for Hugo Chávez, as it has drawn intense scrutiny on what has become of the state oil company PDVSA since Chávez imposed total state control over its operations in 2002.

It is not a pretty sight. In fact, the company stands at the center of a cautionary tale about the destructive impact of Chávez’s politically-motivated policies. For today, PDVSA represents less a modern oil company than it does a political operation designed only to boot the political fortunes of the President.

One would think that a company sitting atop what is believed to be the world’s largest oil reserves at a time of record prices could absorb some measure of short-sighted policies and still function ably. That PDVSA is not is a measure of how disastrously Chávez has ignored critical re-investments in maintenance, safety, and the development of new means of production.

Instead, the company’s last ten years have been marked by decreasing production, safety mishaps, politicization of management, inflated payrolls, and corruption. All the while, Chávez has directed PDVSA to take an ever-larger role in activities that have little or nothing to do with extracting and refining oil.

First, production. The government claims it is producing 2.9 million barrels per day (b/d), but experts claim that with refineries today operating at 69 percent capacity the actual output is more like 2.4 million b/d. In 1997, the year before Chávez was first elected, output was around 3.6 million b/d, one-third more than today. Experts say that given Venezuela’s prospects, it should be producing 5 million b/d. So far, high international prices have masked the impact of the declining cash flow, but that mirage will not last forever.

Secondly, those with knowledge of the Venezuelan oil industry say there has been a critical lack of re-investment into maintenance and production. They say investment in oil related activities has averaged $9 to $10 billion per year over the last four years — half of what is necessary to maintain production and just one quarter of what PDVSA needs to expand production and build new facilities.

So where is the money going? Into an account controlled directly by Hugo Chávez, bypassing the Central Bank and the National Assembly, meaning there is no accountability and no transparency of how the funds are dispersed. We do know, however, that earlier this year Finance Minister Jorge Giordani said that the government had invested more than $500 billion in social programs.

Now, there is certainly nothing wrong in using oil revenues to boost the social sector; the critical question is whether those revenues are being used efficiently and with an eye towards the long-term health of PDVSA and Venezuela. But it seems all that is lost on Hugo Chávez. The political goal of – getting re-elected – is all encompassing and trumps concerns of productivity and safety.

Today, PDVSA is involved in activities wholly outside its competence: including managing food imports and distribution, building houses, mining, agriculture, and meat production. Indeed, the list is being constantly expanded according to Chávez’s whims. As such, the number of PDVSA employees has expanded from some 40,000 in 2002 to around 115,000 today. The results have been predictably slap-dash.

Clearly, poor re-investment, declining production, diversion to non-oil related activities, bloated payroll, and skyrocketing debt are taking their toll on PDVSA. With no indication Chávez has any intention to change his policies, it’s an open question how long the company can maintain its present course. But PDVSA’s fate is intricately linked to Chávez’s populist political project. He came to power claiming to the masses that for decades “others” (elites, foreign interests) had plundered Venezuela’s national patrimony at their expense. He was to be their avenger, making up for years of neglect by squeezing every last ounce of Venezuelan crude out of the ground for the people’s benefit — even if he effectively kills Venezuela’s ability to secure oil revenues in the process. Populism may have been a great way to get elected, but it is a terrible way to govern.

 
Jun
26
2012
Posted by
admin
Comments

Venezuela election ads glorifying Chavez irk foes

Chicago Tribune via Reuters
June 26, 2012
Andrew Cawthorne

70698710 Venezuela election ads glorifying Chavez irk foes

Courtesy of: Reuters

CARACAS (Reuters) – Political ads exalting Venezuela’s socialist President Hugo Chavez as second only to God have offended opponents and added further controversy to an already spicy election campaign.

State TV is repeatedly playing a minute-long publicity spot highlighting the story of Andres Ospino, who was granted a new home for his family by a state building program. (To view the ad, click on http://bit.ly/O5YTuh)

“I have a saying: ‘First God, second my Comandante,’” waxes Ospino in his new apartment after a moody opening sequence of dawn breaking over Caracas. He also calls Chavez “this Bolivar,” in reference to 19th century South American independence hero Simon Bolivar.

The publicity goes to the heart of Chavez’s push for re-election on October 7. The campaign is built around his personality and depends heavily on the government’s popular welfare policies that are paid for by oil revenue.

While the promise of a new home is a vote-winner among Venezuela’s poor majority, opponents scoff at it as crass electioneering and say the quasi-religious adulation of Chavez is offensive in a Roman Catholic nation.

“It’s a vulgar copy of what they did in the Soviet Union under Stalin, of what they still do in Communist Cuba and North Korea,” wrote columnist Geronimo Figueroa in a provincial Venezuelan newspaper.

The charismatic 57-year-old former soldier, who has dominated the South American nation since assuming office in 1999, will face a single opposition “unity” candidate, Henrique Capriles, in the election.

CHAVEZ LEADS POLLS

Chavez leads most opinion polls by a double-digit margin thanks to his strong personality and enduring emotional connection with the poor, sympathy over his battle with cancer, the popularity of welfare programs and an uptick in the economy.

The “housing mission” is wildly popular with working-class Venezuelans, and state TV repeatedly churns out statistics of how many homes have been built around the nation.

Capriles, 39, is successfully projecting an image of youth and energy in contrast to the president – who is largely confined to his palace due to his illness – and is drawing large crowds on a nationwide campaign tour.

In the growing publicity war, the opposition cannot match the resources of Chavez, who frequently obliges both state and private TV stations to carry his speeches and appearances live in so-called “cadena,” or “chain,” broadcasts.

Capriles’ supporters did strike a chord with one tongue-in-cheek Internet ad mimicking a sports company’s publicity in Venezuela. In the original spot, a young soccer fan is seen reluctantly removing a Brazil shirt – then joyfully donning the colors of his “real passion,” Venezuela’s national team.

In the satirical version, a man wearing the red of Chavez’s ruling Socialist Party says a long farewell, before swapping it for a blue T-shirt emblazoned with Capriles’ campaign slogan, “There Is A Way,” then running off with a skip in his step. (To view the ad, click on http://bit.ly/KeOFq4)

While reducing opposition activists to tears of laughter, the ad has drawn derision from the government.

“That loser needs to go the gym and do some exercise,” mocked Chavez’s campaign head Jorge Rodriguez, in reference to the actor’s generous waistline.

(Additional reporting by Marianna Parraga; Editing by Brian Ellsworth and Will Dunham)

To read this article on the Chicago Tribune, please click here.